D. Salinger moon if you’re a great “bored stiff white pet” shows up, goes over, and you will hits their left-hand

A reason from Seymour as the an actual physical entity nearly proves Friend’s undoing

/. Friend could be the basic so you can acknowledge your poems remove something-a lot -during the “interpretation by the paraphrase.” Although development is clear: unsentimentalized lesser times regarding big lights otherwise epiphany; carefully etched vignettes and this let you know the brand new “religious method” according to the externals. As the an excellent critic, Seymour is represented courtesy their remarks into the an abundance of Pal’s stories, in addition to essence of their suggestions try summarized in 2 questions he informs Pal he’s going to feel questioned given that a writer as he dies: “Had been your primary a-listers away? Was you hectic composing your cardio away?” Although Seymour’s concerns, including his poems, may not feel paraphrased, he seems to recommend that insight and you will effect -within their greatest sensory faculties -must be involved in higher composing; and for the viewer they feel those individuals elusive, indefinable properties that will be deeply swinging and you may lighting-up. As he goes through a catalogue out of Seymour’s physical attributes – tresses, ears, eyes, nose, sound, surface, attire – the guy will get an increasing number of intrusive much less defined, oftentimes, apparently, sorely close disintegration (particularly, he declares just after a quick passing into Seymour’s ears, “I’ll sleep. . . . Both hands are work, the latest bowels churning. The latest Incorporated Kid is not at your home”). “Seymour: An introduction” looks less a story just like the an enthusiastic assemblage off notes, findings, anecdotes, and you will irrelevancies (“flowering parentheses”), similar to Buddy’s (or Salinger’s) diary, at which a narrative might eventually be made. The latest Seymour one to exists is consistent with the Seymour we have come to know currently; the new thing is displayed, this new intricacies shown, but no undoubtedly the newest dimensions are set in their portrait. You might say, after that, the storyline is Friend’s, while we pick him the very first time in all his agony of spirit wanting to maintain and 41

Regarding tale, recommendations are built, such as into really works you to definitely Pal have composed, you to push it identity

bolster his master toward evasive truths hiding in the Seymour’s life. The guy appears from inside the hopeless demand for them. He raises himself in the beginning, with irony, due to the fact a keen “ecstatically pleased man”; and also at the conclusion, when he makes to visit category, the guy knows that “no single matter” the guy really does is “more important than simply entering one awful Space 307.” Due to the fact Seymour shortly after told you, “the i do our very own entire lifestyle are move from you to little little bit of Holy Soil to a higher.” “Seymour: An intro” is believed to feel the form one hides setting, making use of the seeming irrelevancies deliberately made to do an even greater than usual fantasy off facts – the real fact (a method, by the way, not unusual, because the witness Dostoevski’s “Cards from Underground” otherwise Rilke’s The notebook off Malte Laurids Brigge). But, however, there was a constant doubt concerning the author’s handle, question which is some bolstered by Pal’s perennial similarity so you’re able to Salinger. Certainly one of Pal’s performs is Brand hoe te zien wie je leuk vindt op ohlala zonder te betalen new Catcher on the Rye, a few anyone else try “Boost Highest the fresh Rooftop Ray, Carpenters” (where Pal are narrator) and you can “A perfect Time getting Bananafish” (and he wasn’t), but still various other is “Teddy” (Pal actually rates from it). Such as facts as these while others do not, definitely, establish one thing, even so they manage strongly recommend – and just recommend – you to Salinger is actually discussing, yet not obliquely, his personal loss of handle and diffusion from skill. Salinger’s much time silence following the look of “Seymour: An intro” during the 1959 was concluded from inside the 1965 towards guide of some other chapter throughout the Cup saga, “Hapworth 16, 1924.” So it story did nothing to guarantees those who hoped-for a good come back to the sooner excellence regarding Catcher on the Rye. Indeed, they had a tendency to complement those individuals functions of your own later on performs and that most members found disturbing- a boring length, a laughs commonly mind-knowingly precious, a muting regarding story in favor of philosophical asides. In spite 42

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Abrir Whatsapp
Olá, seja bem-vindo.
Em quê podemos ajudar?